Prior to being recorded as an ANP your line manager needs to confirm that you have completed all the required training for the role and have evidence that you meet all the required competencies. This process is termed ‘final sign-off’.
Final sign-off is required when an individual:
For final sign-off the ANP trainee should select out the ePortfolio evidence which best demonstrates their learning and competence. The trainee ANP will submit a ‘Share-Pack’ of this evidence to their line manager when they are ready for ‘final sign-off’.
Final Sign-off involves:
The trainee ANP will develop a share pack of evidence within the ePortfolio which meets the requirements of final sign-off.
The tANPs manager sets a date for the tANP to submit the ‘Share Pack’ and shares this with the Practice Assessor. Both would be expected to review the portfolio and confirm it meets the criteria for final sign-off. As a minimum the following is expected:
The Practice Assessor and Line Manager will together determine whether the trainee has:
If the trainee has passed, the line manager would complete the final sign off form. The trainee will upload and add this to the share pack and forward the completed share pack to [email protected] for internal moderation.
If the internal moderator agrees that the portfolio meets all of the requirements then the trainee, employed as Band 7 Annex 21 or Band 6, would be expected to move to a Band 7 at this stage.
If a provisional pass by either line manager or internal moderator, the line manager would set a period of time (no less than 1 month and usually no-more than 6 months) for the individual to obtain the required evidence.
Trainees employed as Band 7 Annex 21 or band 6 would not normally move until competence has been achieved.
If a fail, the line manager, in consultation with others (which may include the clinical supervisor, education supervisor and Human Resources) the most appropriate course of action for the individual. This may include re-doing part of the training or termination of the traineeship.
If the Practice Assessor and Line Manager cannot agree on a grade the view of the internal moderator should be sought.
As part of quality assurance, it is current practice in NHSGGC for all share packs submitted for final sign-off to be internally moderated by an Advanced Practice Lecturer Practitioner.
A sample of portfolios will be externally moderated each year via the Advanced Practice Academy. This mechanism will involve a suitable expert from another Board reviewing ePortfolios and providing feedback to the line manager, the Board Advanced Practice Lead and the Board Nurse Director.
External Experts will be recorded within their employing Board as an ANP or NMAHP Consultant and either have teaching and assessing qualification or be recognised by the Academy as an ‘External Expert’.
The Academy’s recommendations will be advisory only. Ultimately it will be for the employer to determine whether an individual has met all the requirements to practice.
 Supervised practice may involve direct supervision where the supervisor is physically present with the trainee or indirect where supervision is provided at a distance or delegated to another clinician
 This may include formal academic modules/courses, clinical courses, eLearning, reflection
 Individual specialist areas may require higher numbers that specified here
Final Sign off documentation
Click here to see the ‘Final Sign-off’ documentation that the line manager and supervisor in practice will use to assess the ePortfolio.
Example of an ePortfolio share pack
Please click on the link below to see a dummy ePortfolio for a trainee ANP. In this portfolio you’ll see evidence being gathered to meet the requirements for final sign-off.
Please note the numbering system and ordering being used to make it easier for a reviewer to find the evidence.
DOPS Direct Observation of Procedural Skill (DOPS)
CBD Case Based Discussion (CbD)
REF Reflective Account
FFO Feedback from Others
SPR Supervisor in Practice Report
Please note this is ePortfolio is provided as a sample and do not scrutinise the evidence provided, it is indicative of whats required.